Air France 447, it was a bomb!
By Mark A. Gardner
June 11, 2009
Let's start off by saying, do you really believe, a Thunderstorm or, a frozen "Pitot tube" was the cause of the Crash of Air France 447?
Most of you, reading this article, are in the aviation industry; many are Professional Pilots. If, you are a pilot you know, we have sophisticated weather observation systems, and other technologies, to keep us out of the most dangerous weather.
Do you believe that the dispatchers of this flight were asleep during their flight planning analysis, of this flight? I don't think so... these are intelligent people, with a lot of responsibility.
Ok, how about the other story they want us to believe.
A frozen pitot tube misinformed the ADC (Air Date Computer) and caused an improper speed to be flown, thus contributing to the breakup of the aircraft! This is a good one, we all know that to get an aircraft certified for flight that there is extensive testing before an "Air Worthyness Certificate is ever issued. The Airbus 330 is of European origin; the aircraft had to be approved by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). The aircraft had to prove it's ability to fly into "Known Severe Icing" conditions, before it could receive its Airline Certifications. Then, after the Eurozone approved the aircraft for service the US FAA had to review the data and again approve the aircraft for service in the USA.
Are both of these agencies incompetent?
I don't think so.
So, if these agencies are competent, how can we believe these bogus stories?
Let's face it something is not right here.... Like TWA 800 we are seeing a coverup.
What are they hiding?
A terrorist act?
An attack by someone who didn't like a passenger on board, who knew too much?
I don't know.
Lets look at this event, with some logic. If, the Airbus was taken out by a Thunderstorm, I don't know about you, but I would expect to see larger chunks of wreckage. Large sections of the fuselage, wing and other parts should be remaining. Where are the big pieces? Did they sink to the bottom of the ocean? Maybe?
Many of the parts are missing and scattered about the sea. Very few bodies have been found. They keep changing the story, or reason for the crash.
We should not just accept anything the media feeds us. Something is not right concerning this event?
Were you aware of the fact, (according to drudgereport.com) a couple days days before the disaster, bomb threats were received by Air France concerning flights out of this area?
What would you expect, to see, if the aircraft was destroyed by a bomb or missile?
Well, I must point out, I am not a military bomb expert and, have no training, recognizing whether an aircraft, or any physical object, was exploded by a bomb; However, I do have a brain. Thru logic, I have concluded that any object that is exploded experiences and equal and opposite reaction to the explosion force; The main factor, in the degree of destruction would be a factor of the force applied. With this in mind, we have found very few parts and much of the wreckage is missing.
Explosion?
Perhaps?
Likely?
It seems probable and logical.
What do you think?