Desert Falcon Enterprises, LLC - Operational Information Desert Falcon Rising is your source, information site, for Aviation, Space, Science and Technology News. We don't cover everything, just the most interesting of the leading edge ideas molding our future reality. Stop in and see what's new..... Welcome. https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information Wed, 08 May 2024 23:29:56 +0000 Joomla! 1.5 - Open Source Content Management en-gb Garmin G3000 startup Cessna Citation CJ3+ https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1519-garmin-g3000-takeoff-data https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1519-garmin-g3000-takeoff-data Garmin G3000 startup Cessna Citation CJ3+

 

]]>
desertf1@desertfalconrising.com (Mark Gardner) Operations Sat, 06 Mar 2021 23:43:06 +0000
FAA cockpit email system promises to reduce airline delays https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1336-faa-cockpit-email-system-promises-to-reduce-airline-delays https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1336-faa-cockpit-email-system-promises-to-reduce-airline-delays

FAA cockpit email system promises to reduce airline delays

The email system, called Data Comm, will be used to communicate alternate routes for planes awaiting takeoff. (Julio Cortez/AP)
The email system, called Data Comm, will be used to communicate alternate routes for planes awaiting takeoff. (Julio Cortez/AP)

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is giving the go ahead for a new data and email system that allows tower controllers and airplanes sitting on the tarmac to relay requests and instructions for flight plans.

READ MORE: Seattle Times

]]>
desertf1@desertfalconrising.com (Mark Gardner) Operations Sun, 24 May 2015 04:26:59 +0000
Free Webinar - Advanced Flying with the Ipad and ForeFlight https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1265-free-webinar-advanced-flying-with-the-ipad-and-foreflight https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1265-free-webinar-advanced-flying-with-the-ipad-and-foreflight Free Webinar - Advanced Flying with the Ipad and ForeFlight

]]>
desertf1@desertfalconrising.com (Mark Gardner) Operations Tue, 04 Nov 2014 21:59:34 +0000
Some Fun in the Sky! https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1264-some-fun-in-the-sky https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1264-some-fun-in-the-sky Some Fun in the Sky!

]]>
desertf1@desertfalconrising.com (Mark Gardner) Operations Tue, 04 Nov 2014 06:16:00 +0000
Pilots banned from being Uber drivers in the sky https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1241-pilots-banned-from-being-uber-drivers-in-the-sky https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1241-pilots-banned-from-being-uber-drivers-in-the-sky Pilots banned from being Uber drivers in the sky

Cirrus Demo Aircraft
"You're going to Napa in your Cessna? Me too! If you let me hop in, I'll pay my share of the gas!" That arrangement is legal, but the FAA has declared that connecting brave passengers with amateur pilots for a fee is definitely a no-no. The ruling came from a request for clarification by a company called Airpooler, a small plane equivalent of UberX. That service and others like FlyteNow let private pilots post listings for flight dates and destinations, along with a corresponding fee. Thanks to a 1963 decision, such sharing is legal if done by word of mouth or a notice board, provided the pilot only asks for a fair share of the expenses. However, in a rather confusing letter, the regulator told Airpooler that its service violates the spirit of that ruling. Instead of offering a bonafide "joint venture with a common purpose," participating pilots are "holding out to transport passengers for compensation." That means unless you have a commercial ATP or CPL license, using those services is DOA


[Credit: Brianc/Flickr]

]]>
desertf1@desertfalconrising.com (Mark Gardner) Operations Sun, 17 Aug 2014 20:25:31 +0000
FAA Domestic Drone Roadmap https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1153-faa-domestic-drone-roadmap- https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1153-faa-domestic-drone-roadmap- FAA Domestic Drone Roadmap

by Adam Clark Estes

]]>
desertf1@desertfalconrising.com (Mark Gardner) Operations Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:11:12 +0000
Learn the E6B Flight Computer https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1147-learn-the-e6b-flight-computer https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1147-learn-the-e6b-flight-computer Learn the E6B Flight Computer

]]>
desertf1@desertfalconrising.com (Mark Gardner) Operations Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:32:44 +0000
FAA Issues SAIB For V-Band Couplings https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1125-faa-issues-saib-for-v-band-couplings https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1125-faa-issues-saib-for-v-band-couplings FAA Issues SAIB For V-Band Couplings

September 10,2013

Applies To Aircraft With Turbocharged Reciprocating Engines

The FAA has issued a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) that applies to airplanes with turbocharged, reciprocating engines. The SAIB outlines the potential for in-flight fire as a result of failure of the exhaust system V-band coupling securing the tailpipe to the turbocharger, the wastegate overboard, or any other exhaust system V-band coupling.

The FAA has issued airworthiness directives (AD) in the past concerning V-band couplings for specific airplane models. These ADs remain in effect where applicable. For those airplanes not affected by a V-band coupling AD, the FAA says this airworthiness concern is not considered an unsafe condition at this time that would warrant AD action.

This SAIB is the result of a review of the accident/incident data associated with V-band couplings. In our review, we find data that indicates a need for continued diligence in the inspection and replacement of exhaust system V-band couplings, as well as adherence to the recommended inspection intervals and procedures contained in the applicable maintenance documentation (e.g.; maintenance/service manual, illustrated parts catalog, service bulletins/letters, etc.). V-band couplings can be included as part of the engine type design, the airplane type design, or a combination of both, depending on the particular manufacturers. It may be necessary to consult both the engine and airplane design approval holders maintenance documentation to ensure you are working with the correct part numbers and, working to the correct procedures, etc. on your airplane. On any given airplane, all of the V-band couplings may be part of the engine design approval or the airplane design approval or a mix of those throughout the exhaust system.

Additionally, supplemental type certificates (STC) or field approvals may have dictated a change in the exhaust system type design and thus the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness for those design approvals should be reviewed. At any time, if you are unsure that your maintenance instructions are accurate and complete, please contact the design approval holder(s) directly for assistance.

The FAA recommends that For V-band coupling replacement, use only new FAA-approved original equipment manufacturer (OEM) or part manufacture approval (PMA) replacement parts for all V-band coupling applications. Ensure that the parts you wish to use contain the same part number specified by the design approval holder (type certificate (TC)/STC/PMA). Many of the features of a V-band coupling are defined in the part numbering and a slight change in the part number can designate a V-band coupling different enough to adversely impact the fit,installation and/or performance of the V-band coupling. Do not use any commercially available V-band couplings that do not have or are not supplied with the proper FAA approval for the intended airplane model installations, even though they may look or seem to be able to perform the same functions.

The agency also recommends adherence to  the applicable design approval holder’s maintenance documentation for all inspection intervals, and replacement procedures for exhaust system V-band couplings. We recommend you adhere to a 50- hour interval for repetitive visual inspections of exhaust system V-band coupling condition, unless the manufacturer recommends or FAA regulations (e.g.; AD) require a different inspection interval; and that as part of all normal first flight of the day pre-flight inspections of the airplane, include an item specific to the engine exhaust system of the airplane, to check the exhaust/tail pipe for security in its mounting. A loose or easily displaced exhaust or tail pipe should be brought to the attention of maintenance personnel prior to further operations.

There are four other recommendations included in the SAIB.

FMI: SAIB

 

]]>
desertf1@desertfalconrising.com (Mark Gardner) Operations Thu, 12 Sep 2013 03:42:45 +0000
FAA Issues SAIB For Circuit Breaker Switches https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1077-faa-issues-saib-for-circuit-breaker-switches https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1077-faa-issues-saib-for-circuit-breaker-switches FAA Issues SAIB For Circuit Breaker Switches

Components Used In Some Cessna, Beechcraft, Homebuilt Airplanes

The FAA has issued an SAIB (Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin) that will affect airplanes equipped with W31 series switch style circuit breakers (SSCB) manufactured by Tyco or Potter Brumfield. There have been known continued failures of these SSCBs on Cessna Aircraft Company airplanes and Beechcraft Corporation (formerly known as Hawker Beechcraft Corporation) airplanes.

These circuit breaker switches may also be installed on other type certificated airplanes as well as homebuilt airplanes.

The FAA is aware of continued failures of W31 series SSCB manufactured by Tyco or Potter Brumfield. The concern is for all airplanes that have Tyco or Potter Brumfield SSCBs installed, including those airplanes that have complied with AD 2005-20-25 for certain Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) models and AD 2008-13-17 for certain Beechcraft Corporation (Beechcraft) models. These SSCBs could be installed under a type certificate (TC), a supplemental type certificate (STC), or other means.

Known Cessna airplanes include Models 401, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A, 402B, 402C, 404, 411, 411A, 414, 414A, 421, 421A, 421B, 421C, 425, and 441 airplanes equipped with circuit breaker switch, part number (P/N) CM3589-50, 593-250-101, 593-250-102, W31-X2M5A-50, or W31-X1000-50. Known Beechcraft airplanes include F33 Series and Models G33, V35B, A36, A36TC, B36TC, 95- B55, D55, E55, A56TC, 58, 58P, 58TC, G58, and 77 airplanes equipped with circuit breaker switch part number (P/N) 35-380132-1 through 35-380132-53, which were required to be removed by the AD and are no longer allowed to be installed, and P/N 35-380132-61 through 35-380132-113.

The prevalent failure mode is in an open condition, thus preventing power to its system. The more rare failure mode is the condition where these devices fail with an internal short that can bypass the internal circuit protection mechanism and leave the system energized. This results in overheating of the SSCB where they get hot to the touch and may eventually produce smoke. This failure can also leave the associated circuit and wiring unprotected in the event of a subsequent short circuit. Review of the Service Difficulty Reporting System data indicates that SSCBs, which are frequently cycled, are more prone to failure. Analysis of available service difficulty report (SDR) data indicates 2 percent of those analyzed failed by 2,000 cycles; 50 percent of those analyzed failed by 6,500 cycles, and 90 percent of those analyzed failed by 10,000 cycles. The FAA’s analysis shows that on average there is one cycle per flight hour for normal operations and four cycles per flight hour for high usage (e.g. flight training).

As previously referenced, the FAA issued ADs for certain Cessna and Beechcraft airplane models that utilize these SSCBs. The cause for the issuance of the ADs were cases where the defective SSCB posed a significant overheat/fire hazard due to internal issues of the circuit breaker switch. The mandated replacement SSCBs incorporated design changes that provide better protection regarding this condition, which mitigated the hazard to an acceptable level. The FAA has continued to monitor this issue and has identified additional mitigations that will further reduce the risk of this issue. We have been working with Cessna Aircraft Company and Beechcraft Corporation to have these aircraft manufacturers work with their suppliers. The manufacturer of these circuit breakers reviewed the issues and provided an additional internal modification since the ADs mandated configuration in an attempt to further reduce the heating affect. The FAA has evaluated the additional data associated with the switches and finds no further mandatory action is warranted at this time.

This SAIB provides recommended replacement guidance for the SSCB, but does not alleviate the original requirements for the previously issued ADs for the Cessna airplanes (AD 2005-20-25) and Beechcraft airplanes (AD 2008-13-17). This SAIB supplements those applicable ADs and also provides guidance to those who have SSCBs on their airplanes that are not specifically covered by the applicable ADs.

The FAA recommends that all owners and operators of the subject airplanes comply with the guidelines outlined in the applicable original equipment manufacturer (OEM) recommended replacement period as described within the respective aircraft maintenance manuals. For airplanes not having any OEM guidelines and using these SSCBs as a switch, the FAA recommends removal, discard, and replacement of these circuit breaker switches every 2,000 flight hours for normal use airplanes or 600 flight hours for high use airplanes (airplanes used for training or airplanes where these circuit breaker switches would be cycled multiple times during a flight).

To help mitigate any adverse affects caused by a failing SSCB, The FAA also recommends that all owners and operators of the subject airplanes incorporate an operational procedure to verify the systems controlled by their circuit breaker switches are indeed off when the circuit breaker switch is turned off. If the SSCB is not functioning properly, replace before the next flight.

From: http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?do=main.textpost&id=6a6f4b28-82cc-4fd4-8337-c240470fd3d0
]]>
Operations Mon, 25 Mar 2013 05:59:32 +0000
FMS Programming 101 - Step 4 -Takeoff Initialization https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1070-fms-programming-101-step-4-takeoff-initialization https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1070-fms-programming-101-step-4-takeoff-initialization FMS Programming 101 - Step 4 - Takeoff Initialization

]]>
Operations Tue, 05 Mar 2013 06:27:02 +0000
Programming the Citation X FMC https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1058-programming-the-citation-x-fmc https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1058-programming-the-citation-x-fmc Programming the Citation X FMC - Steps 1 thru 3 the Basics

The Honeywell Primus 2000 EFIS flight director system is composed of five 7"x8" CRT screens. Dual flight management systems with GPS are standard.

]]>
Operations Fri, 01 Mar 2013 06:37:23 +0000
Professional Pilot Looking for Employment https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1054-professional-pilot-looking-for-employment https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/1054-professional-pilot-looking-for-employment Professional Pilot Looking for Employment - B737, CE500, CE560XL

 

Hi, I'd like to introduce myself.

My name is Mark Gardner and I am a Professional Pilot living in the Las Vegas, Nevada area.

I have many talents that I could put to work for your company.

If, you need a Pilot to operate, or possibly manage your aircraft please feel free to contact me.

 

Below is a short video review of my pilot qualifications.

Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions about my experience.


Thank you.

Mark A. Gardner - Pilot/Webmaster

 

]]>
Operations Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:17:37 +0000
Crew Schedules, Sleep Deprivation, and Aviation Performance https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/970-crew-schedules-sleep-deprivation-and-aviation-performance https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/970-crew-schedules-sleep-deprivation-and-aviation-performance Crew Schedules, Sleep Deprivation, and Aviation Performance

 

ScienceDaily (Apr. 24, 2012) — Night-time departures, early morning arrivals, and adjusting to several time zones in a matter of days can rattle circadian rhythms, compromise attention and challenge vigilance. And yet, these are the very conditions many pilots face as they contend with a technically challenging job in which potentially hundreds of lives are at stake.

In an article to be published in a forthcoming issue of Current Directions in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, John A Caldwell, a psychologist and senior scientist at Fatigue Science, a Honolulu business focusing on fatigue assessment, examines the problem of sleep deprived pilots by teasing out the complex interplay of inadequate sleep and circadian rhythms. He explains how airline industry solutions miss the point and then suggests other options.

Caldwell points out that "fatigue-related performance problems in aviation have been consistently underestimated and underappreciated, despite the fact that decades of research on pilots and other operational personnel has clearly established that fatigue from insufficient sleep significantly degrades basic cognitive performance, psychological mood, and fundamental piloting skills."

Evidence abounds. In 2004, a corporate airlines flight crashed as it approached Kirksville Regional Airport; in 2008, Honolulu based pilots of Go! Airlines overshot their destination by more than thirty miles because they fell asleep during a trip that was only fifty minutes long. A Northwest Airlines Flight overflew its destination by 150 miles because pilots had dozed off at the controls. In 2009, fifty people were killed when a Continental Connection flight en route from Newark to Buffalo crashed into a house. Pilots failed to respond properly to a stall warning and the flight went out of control.

After examining what went wrong, the NTSB concluded that, "the pilots' performance was likely impaired because of fatigue." Since 1990 the US National Transportation Safety Board has placed pilot fatigue on the Most Wanted List of safety related priorities.

Why? Because as fatigue increases, "accuracy and timing degrade, lower standards of performance are accepted, the ability to integrate information from individual flight instruments into a meaningful and overall pattern declines, and attention narrows. "

In one study, F-117 pilots were deprived of one night of sleep and then were tested on precision instruments. Not only did pilot errors on those instruments double after one night of sleep loss, pilots reported feeling depressed and confused.

Clearly fatigue is fundamentally the result of insufficient sleep, but for pilots the important issue is the consequences of that sleep loss when they are sitting at the control panel. The author suggests that "fatigue related risks increase substantially when (a) the waking period is longer than 16 hours, (b) the preduty sleep period is shorter than 6 hours, or (c) the work period occurs during the pilot's usual sleep hours."  READ MORE: Science Daily

]]>
Operations Sat, 12 May 2012 09:59:37 +0000
Safety Management System (SMS) https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/907-safety-management-system-sms- https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/907-safety-management-system-sms- Aviation Safety

Safety Management System (SMS)

What is a Safety Management System (SMS)?
SMS is the formal, top-down business approach to managing safety risk, which includes a systemic approach to managing safety, including the necessary organizational structures, accountabilities, policies and procedures. (Order VS 8000.367)

The Aviation Safety Organization's Safety Management System Website was created as a public resource for those seeking to learn more about SMS within the aviation industry and the FAA. The website will also provide resources to individuals and aviation product/service provider organizations seeking to learn more about implementing a SMS within their organization.

SMS introduces an evolutionary process in system safety and safety management. SMS is a structured process that obligates organizations to manage safety with the same level of priority that other core business processes are managed. This applies to both internal (FAA) and external aviation industry organizations (Operator & Product Service Provider).

This website will evolve; please continue to visit this site periodically for enhancements, updates and the most current information about SMS, Aviation Safety and the interface with FAA.

SMS Explained Get quickly up to speed! What is SMS? Where did it come from? How does it work?
SMS Rulemaking Activities Information regarding our FAA Aviation Safety rulemaking activities.
SMS International Collaboration Information about our SMS international collaboration efforts.
Reference Library Information at your fingertips. Access a wide range of guide books, articles, websites, and training materials for you and your staff.
SMS Pilot Projects Have you heard about the FAA Voluntary Implementation Efforts and Pilot Projects? Learn about current (and future) planned activities.
FAQs Get the answers to some frequently asked questions.
Specifics by Aviation Industry Type Information tailored to your specific sector (ex: Air Carriers, Air Taxi, Air Tour, Maintenance under 121, Repair Stations, Non-Certificated Repair Facilities, Flight Schools, Simulator Facilities, Airports, etc.)
Contacts Contact information for FAA offices working with SMS.

Please send us your feedback! What would you like to see on this website? Please feel free to email your comments to 9-AWA-AVS-SMS@faa.gov.

Source: http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/sms/

]]>
Operations Fri, 09 Dec 2011 06:52:52 +0000
Can I (Legally) Use My iPad? https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/890-can-i-legally-use-my-ipad- https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/890-can-i-legally-use-my-ipad-

Can I (Legally) Use My iPad?

 

Since acquiring my Apple iPad® last summer
and stocking it with an ever-evolving suite of aviation apps, this amazing and, yes, magical device has become my favorite tool for 21st century flight planning, flight management, and flight monitoring. Every pilot who sees its capabilities seems to want one, but the first question I usually get — even before the obligatory exchange of best app tips — concerns the legalities of using iPad during flight.

Straight from the Source

For those operating under Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 91, the single
best source of information about the FAA’s view of iPad use is Advisory Circular 91-78,
Use of Class 1
or Class 2 Electronic Flight Bag (EFB).
AC 91-78 is applicable to instrument flight rules (IFR) or visual flight rules (VFR), preflight, flight, and postflight operations conducted under part 91 unless such use is prohibited by a specific section of 14 CFR chapter I. AC 91-78 provides “information for removal of paper aeronautical charts and other documentation from the cockpit through the use of either portable or installed cockpit displays (electronic flight bags).” Though its July 2007 publication date obviously preceded the iPad’s introduction in 2010, the guidance still applies.

If you aren’t certain about the definition of EFB, AC 91-78 can help. In brief, it defines an EFB as an electronic system that can display a range of aviation data (e.g., checklists, navigation charts, pilot’s operating handbook (POH)) or perform basic calculations (e.g., performance data, fuel calculations). Physical EFBs may be portable (Class 1), attached to a mounting device (Class 2), or built into the aircraft (Class 3).

As far as the FAA is concerned, “The in-flight use of an EFB in lieu of paper reference material is the decision of the aircraft operator and the pilot in command” for part 91. This guidance applies as long as the interactive or precomposed information used for navigation or performance planning is valid, up-to-date, and functionally equivalent to the paper reference material it replaces.

Do I Need Paper Back-ups?

The FAA does not require you to carry paper, but AC 91-78 suggests that pilots consider a secondary source of aeronautical information. The secondary source could be a separate electronic display.

A related point is AC 91-78’s recommendation for implementing an EFB. The idea is to practice with the iPad or other EFB before you leave your paper products at home. Items to evaluate include: workload management
during various phases of flight, integration of the EFB into the cockpit, display and lighting, and system failures. You also need a solid grasp of the aeronautical information apps you are using. You don’t want to be fumbling for the right data at a critical phase of flight.

Other considerations include power and signal strength. Though the iPad’s battery life is excellent, intensive use over a long flight can drain the battery faster than you might expect — especially if you start with less than 100 percent. Several after-market devices are available to boost and stabilize the GPS signal reception to your iPad.

Note: Operators of large and turbine-powered multiengine and fractional ownership aircraft operating under part 91F and part 91K should reference AC 120-76, Guidelines for the Certification, Airworthiness, and Operational Use of Electronic Flight Bags (EFB) (currently under revision), for specific functionality and/or equipage guidelines.

Susan Parson is a Special Assistant in the FAA’s Flight Standards Service and editor of FAA Safety Briefing. She is an active general aviation pilot and flight instructor.

Learn More

AC 91-78 Use of Class 1 or Class 2 Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) – July 2007 http://rgl.faa.gov/REGULATORY_AND_ GUIDANCE_LIBRARY/RGADVISORYCIRCULAR. NSF/0/eb15b0c685650a0486257321006b3b8c/$F ILE/AC%2091_78.pdf

InFO 11011 – May 13, 2011 - The Apple
iPad and Other Suitable Tablet Computing Devices as Electronic Flight Bags (EFB)
http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/ airline_operators/airline_safety/info/all_infos/ media/2011/InFO11011.pdf

“Flying Paperless Airplanes” – FAA Safety Briefing – May June 2010

page23image20836
page23image20976
page23image21116
page23image21256
page23image21396
page23image21536
page23image21676
page23image21816
page23image21956

September/October 2011 FAA Safety Briefing

]]>
Operations Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:17:25 +0000
Find Current Aviation Gas Prices - By Globalair.com https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/873-find-current-aviation-gas-prices-by-globalaircom https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/873-find-current-aviation-gas-prices-by-globalaircom  

Find Current Aviation Gas Prices - By Globalair.com

Global Air Gas Map

(Click on your region below)

Average 100LL

]]>
Operations Tue, 09 Aug 2011 06:47:21 +0000
What To Do When No Departure Procedure Is Issued With Clearance https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/822-what-to-do-when-no-departure-procedure-is-issued-with-clearance https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/822-what-to-do-when-no-departure-procedure-is-issued-with-clearance What To Do When No Departure Procedure Is Issued With Clearance

Some confusion exists as to what a pilot is supposed to do when a "Cleared as Filed" clearance is issued by ATC from an airport, but no Departure Procedure (DP) is assigned in the clearance. ATC at some airports may not issue a Departure Procedure as part of the clearance.

However, the pilot is expected to determine a way to safely depart the airport and join the enroute structure defined in the ATC clearance (or flight plan if "cleared as filed"). One way to accomplish this-and normally the safest way in IMC-is to fly the appropriate published Departure Procedure. If a textual DP has been established for the airport, it will be found in the front of the U.S. Terminal Procedures Publication under Take-Off Minimums And (Obstacle) Departure Procedures.

If there is more than one Departure Procedure, the pilot should fly the one most appropriate to the route of flight. Absent specific departure instructions from ATC, the pilot may also elect to "climb on course," but only if he/she has determined that adequate terrain and/or obstruction clearance can be maintained until reaching the minimum IFR altitude (MIA), or minimum enroute altitude (MEA).

Weather conditions permitting, a pilot may request a "VFR climb" for the initial portion of the flight. While this will often expedite your departure clearance, note that this provision applies only to the vertical aspect of the ATC IFR clearance. The pilot is expected to follow the ground track as assigned, overflying the fixes or airways stated in the clearance. A "VFR climb" is not permission to deviate from the cleared route.

As part of your IFR preflight planning always familiarize yourself with the airport written and graphic departure procedures. You may not always be assigned one by ATC but you are expected to determine a safe departure method-a published DP is one way to accomplish that.

Following a published DP is also appropriate if you depart VFR expecting to pick up an IFR clearance en route, especially at night when terrain features, such as mountains, are not clearly visible - just remember to stay VFR until you have your IFR clearance.

FMI: http://aeronav.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=aeronav/applications/d_tpp

]]>
Operations Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:18:39 +0000
Avidyne, Jeppesen To Provide Jeppview Charts For iPad https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/771-avidyne-jeppesen-to-provide-jeppview-charts-for-ipad https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/771-avidyne-jeppesen-to-provide-jeppview-charts-for-ipad Avidyne, Jeppesen To Provide Jeppview Charts For iPad

Available To Entegra & MFD Customers

Owners of Avidyne's displays with CMax Charts can now download Terminal Charts, Airport Diagrams and/or European VFR Charts subscription from Jeppesen for use on Apple iPad at no additional charge, the company announced Monday.

"Jeppesen has developed an easy-to-use iPad application, Jeppesen Mobile TC, that allows general aviation pilots to receive all the information from their standard Airway Manual and VFR Manual in an easy-to-use electronic format," said Thomas Wede, Jeppesen senior vice president and general manager, Aviation. "Now, Avidyne MFD customers with CMax can download an iPad App to view their current chart subscriptions at no additional charge."

READ MORE:    AeroNews

]]>
Operations Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:01:05 +0000
FAA’s Circuit Breaker policy could change https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/710-faas-circuit-breaker-policy-could-change https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/710-faas-circuit-breaker-policy-could-change FAA’s Circuit Breaker policy could change
from AIN: Regulations and Government by Chad Trautvetter

The FAA issued a draft policy memorandum that would change circuit-breaker layouts in aircraft electrical systems, as well as how pilots deal with tripped ­circuit breakers. Comments are due by September 12. Principal changes would be for manufacturers to group and identify essential and non-essential circuit breakers in Part 23 aircraft and to publish flight manual guidance about when to reset circuit breakers. According to the FAA, it has allowed resetting of circuit breakers or replacement of fuses while in flight, but current Part 25 advisory information “is to recommend that no pilot should reset any ­circuit breaker more than once.”

Original Article from: Ainonline.com

]]>
Operations Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:27:11 +0000
Aviation Rules of Thumb https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/678-aviation-rules-of-thumb https://www.desertfalconrising.com/joomla/index.php/operational-information/678-aviation-rules-of-thumb  

AVIATION RULES OF THUMB

The following information is provided as a guideline for better flying.

Use this information at your own risk. Nothing is written in stone here.


1) Altimeter correction for non-standard pressure
'From high to low, look below'
1 mb = 30 feet
FL 270 QNH 977
ISA - 36 mb ???? 36 x 30 = 1080 feet
Altitude = 25920 feet

2) Altimeter correction for non-standard temperature
'From high to low, look below'
Corr (feet) = 4 x ? ISA x altitude (feet)
1000
FL 300 ISA - 6°C
Corr = 4 x 6 x 30 = 680 feet
Alt = 29320 feet

3) SAT out of TAT
SAT (°C) = TAT (°C) - 3 x Mach
TAT = -17 °C Mach 0.64
SAT = -17 – 3 x 6 = -17 - 18 = -35 °C

4) SAT out of TAT for higher Mach and lower Temp
SAT (°C) = TAT (°C) - (100 x Mach) - 50
TAT = -31 °C Mach 0.74
You have 24 above M 0.50
SAT = -31 -24 = -55 °C

5) Level Off procedure if R/C ? 1000 feet/min (also for descent R/D)
? feet = R/C (feet/min)
10
Climbing to FL 210 R/C = 2000 feet/min
? feet = 200 feet ???? start level off at 20800 feet

6) Level Off procedure if R/C > 1000 feet/min (also for descent R/D)
? feet = 2 x R/C (feet/min)
10
Climbing to FL 300 R/C = 2500 feet/min
? feet = 500 feet ???? start level off at 29500 feet

7) Cruise Flight Level computation

NO OFFICIAL USE -ACCURACY CANNOT BE GUARANTEED - FOR INFO ONLY !

Cruise FL = Trip Distance (NM)
EBBR-EBOS = 60 NM
Optimum is FL 60

8) Vertical Speed to rejoin assigned altitude
V/S (feet/min) = 2 x ? feet
If on 6250 feet instead of 6000 feet, correct with V/S = 500 feet/min

9) To obtain TAS out of Mach-number (high altitudes - cruise)
TAS (kt) = 6 x Mach
M 0.72
TAS = 420 kt

10) To find TAS out of IAS and FL
TAS (kt) = IAS (kt) + FL
2
FL 300 IAS = 240 kt
TAS = 240 + 150 = 390 kt

11) Ground Speed out of Mach
GS (NM/min) = 10 x Mach
M 0.72
GS = 7,2 NM/min


NO OFFICIAL USE -ACCURACY CANNOT BE GUARANTEED - FOR INFO ONLY !

12) Drift computation in cruise
Drift (°) = X-wind (kt)
Mach
M 0.7 X-wind 35 kt
Drift = 35 / 7 = 5°

13) Drift computation out of TAS (not IAS, unless during approach)
Drift (°) = X-wind (kt) .
speed number
TAS 180 kt X-wind 36 kt
Drift = 36 / 3 = 12°

14) To find Ground Speed with DME station available
GS (kt) = 10 x distance (NM) in 36s
Read distance covered in 36 seconds towards or away from station

15) Off-Track distance
Off-Track Distance = ?° x distance to station
60
9° off track 11 NM from station
Off-Track Distance = 9 x 11 / 60 = 99 / 60 = 1.6 NM

16) Slant distance overhead a DME – station
each 6000 feet altitude ???? 1 NM DME
Overhead station FL 330
you will read 33000 / 6000 = 5.5 NM on DME

17) Intercepting outbound leg when close to the VOR-DME station (valid for Mach 0.7)
1 NM for each ?30°
FL 330 Inbound on R-180 (Hdg N) to track 060 outbound
Start your turn to 060 at 2 NM before (+ slant 5.5NM)

18) Intercept Heading when passing over station before turning to outbound Heading
Attack (°) = 1/3 x ?Track (°)
Inbound on 180 (Hdg N) to track 060 outbound
Take Heading 080 overhead Station to intercept Radial

19) Intercept Heading when a little bit off-track
Attack (°) = 3 x Off-Track angle (°)
On R-310 outbound instead of R-315
Take attack 15° to rejoin

20) Top of Descent (Idle thrust - 3° descent path)
TOD (NM) = ? FL
3
FL 280 down to 2000 feet
TOD = 260 / 3 = 87 NM

21) R/D required to be down at certain point
R/D (feet/min) = speed number x altitude (feet)
distance (NM)
Descent 17000 feet in the next 28 NM TAS 240 kt
R/D = 4 x 17000 / 28 = 2400 feet/min

22) Vertical speed by changing Body Attitude (valid for high speeds)
R/D (feet/min) = Mach x ?BA (°)
Mach 0.74 ???? One degree BA results in 740 feet/min

23) Vertical speed by changing Body Attitude (valid for lower speeds)
Use TAS or IAS in approach
R/D (feet/min) = speed number x ?BA (°)
Speed TAS 420 kt BA 3 degrees down
R/D = 7 x 3 = 2100 feet/min

NO OFFICIAL USE -ACCURACY CANNOT BE GUARANTEED - FOR INFO ONLY !

24) Distance required if you want to maintain a certain R/D profile
Distance (NM) = speed number x altitude (feet)
R/D
Descent 23000 feet at 1000 feet/min TAS 300 kt
Distance = 5 x 23 = 115 NM

25) Wind correction for descent distance
Wind Corr (NM) = 10% for each 40 kt component
Example Thumbrule 20) with 20 kts Tailwind
Add 58 to 87 = 92 NM

26) R/D required to follow a certain glide %
R/D (feet/min) = Ground Speed (kt) x %
TAS 350 kts 20 kts tailwind Glide 3° = 5%
R/D = 370 x 5 = 1850 feet/min

27) Conversion % versus degrees for glide path
% = 10 x degrees
6
ILS 3° Glide Slope ???? 30 / 6 = 5%

28) Start the roll-out from a turn when
?Heading (°) to go = Bank (°)
3
Bank 25° Right turn to Hdg 080
Start roll-out 8° in advance, thus on Hdg 072

29) Amount of Bank required for a turn
Bank (°) = ? Heading (°)
Heading North Right to Heading 007
Take 7° Bank

30) Bank required for a rate one turn
Bank (°) = 15% TAS (kt)
TAS 180 kt Rate one turn
Bank = 18 + 9 = 27°

31) Turn diameter of a rate one turn
Diameter (NM) = TAS (kt)
100
TAS 150 kt
Turn ? = 1,5 NM

32) Outbound timing for a base turn, when not mentioned on the chart
Time (min) = 36 .
?Track
ILS Rwy 27 (QFU 270) Teardrop 066 outbound
Time = 36 / (090-066) = 1,5 min

33) R/D to follow the glide slope ILS 3° = 5%
R/D (feet/min) = 5 x Ground Speed (kt)
On Glide Slope TAS 140 kt 10 kt Tailwind
R/D = 750 feet/min

34) Visibility required to see threshold at VDP (Non-Precision Approach)
Vis (m) = 6 x MDA (feet)
MDA 430 feet
Visibility = 6 x 430 feet = 2500 m

 

35) Memorize this table 1/60 speed (kt)

Second number is Speed in Miles Per Minute
120 = 2
150 = 2.5
180 = 3
210 =3.5
240 = 4
270 = 4.5
300 = 5
330 = 5.5

]]>
Operations Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:28:56 +0000